Home / Hotels / GoodStay

GoodStay

Back
Fakkellaan 1, 5624 EA Eindhoven, Nederland
Accommodation Hotel
3.8 (26 reviews)

Located on Fakkellaan in Eindhoven, GoodStay offers accommodation that, on paper, appears to offer a solution for those looking for a place to stay. The name "GoodStay" suggests a pleasant experience. However, a closer look at the experiences of former residents paints a very different picture. The available information, primarily from user reviews, points to structural problems that go beyond minor inconveniences and significantly impact the quality of life. Consequently, the overall rating is extremely low, which should warn potential tenants to proceed with caution.

A School Converted into Living Space: The Physical Reality

One of GoodStay's most striking features is the building's origins. Several sources indicate that the property is a former kindergarten or school that has been converted into a residential facility. While repurposing buildings can be a sustainable idea, the execution in this case appears to be seriously flawed. According to testimonies, the transformation of classrooms into habitaciones (rooms) was carried out in a very rudimentary manner. There's mention of plasterboard walls, described by one resident as "cardboard walls," separating the spaces. This detail is crucial, as it implies very poor sound insulation. For residents, this means a potential constant lack of privacy and peace, with the sounds of neighbors inevitably intruding on their own living space. This is in stark contrast to the standards one would expect from even the most basic hostels or hotels .

The layout is described as three-room units sharing a kitchen and living room, separated from what was once a classroom. This model of shared facilities is not uncommon in budget hospedaje , but the quality of the workmanship and the condition of the facilities are stumbling blocks here. Another significant problem cited is the lack of basic amenities. For example, one reviewer reports that there was no electricity in the room, a fundamental shortcoming that makes it impossible to function normally in the 21st century. Furthermore, the winter heating is described as inadequate, with the recommendation to bring your own heater. This is not only uncomfortable but can also pose health risks during the cold Dutch winters.

Sanitary Facilities: A Source of Concern

Perhaps the most alarming aspect of the criticism leveled at GoodStay concerns the sanitary facilities. The showers and toilets are described as "shared," which is not unusual for an albergue or budget accommodation. However, their condition is far below any acceptable standard. One reviewer describes the showers as inferior to those at a campsite, which is already a telling comparison. Another, very disturbing, reviewer reports extremely unsanitary behavior by fellow residents, including leaving feces in the showers. These kinds of experiences point to a serious failure in both the management and cleaning of the facility, and in the social control among residents. For anyone looking for a posada or hostería with minimal hygiene, these descriptions are a definite red flag. The photos of the complex show a functional, somewhat institutional building, but fail to capture the reality of daily hygiene and maintenance, which, according to user experiences, leave much to be desired.

The Social Environment and Management

The problems at GoodStay don't appear to be solely structural or facility-related. Several reviews point to a problematic social environment. Terms like "lack of respect for common property" and "general animalistic behavior" are used to describe the atmosphere. This creates a vicious cycle: poor amenities can lead to apathy and disrespectful behavior among residents, further deteriorating living conditions. It's an environment far removed from the peace and security one seeks in a departamento or apartamentos vacacionales .

Interestingly, the only positive (5-star) review among the scathing criticisms is this one. This person acknowledges that "the conditions are not optimal," but places the blame entirely on the "users of the facility." This offers a nuance: management may not be solely to blame. It suggests that the target group, identified by research as primarily migrant workers, may be living under difficult circumstances, and that this is impacting the living environment. Nevertheless, the responsibility for maintaining basic standards, cleanliness, and order remains with the landlord. The lack of service, as reported by one resident, and the overall condition of the property indicate that management is failing to create a safe and hygienic living environment.

Price vs. Quality: A Skewed Relationship

A crucial question for any form of alojamiento is whether the price is commensurate with the quality offered. One reviewer notes that for GoodStay's rent, "one could easily find a normal apartment." If this claim is true, GoodStay's value proposition is completely lost. It presents itself as a budget option, but if it isn't significantly cheaper than superior alternatives on the regular rental market, there's no reason to choose these spartan conditions. Potential clients, whether students, migrant workers, or others seeking temporary accommodation, should take this consideration very seriously. It's not a luxury resort or a set of idyllic villas or cabañas ; the reality is that of very basic, and according to the vast majority of reviews, substandard housing.

A Well-Considered Choice is Necessary

In summary, GoodStay on Fakkellaan in Eindhoven presents a complex and predominantly negative picture. The transformation of a school building into residential space appears to have been carried out with minimal resources, resulting in thin walls, inadequate heating, and inadequate basic amenities. The hygienic conditions, particularly in the shared restrooms, are described as shockingly poor. While the attitude of fellow residents plays a role in the negative experience, the consistency of complaints points to a failing management that is unable to guarantee an acceptable standard of living. Given the criticism of the value for money, this seems to be an accommodation to be approached with great caution. Judging by the numerous testimonials, the name "GoodStay" is a painful irony for a place that, for many, proved to be anything but a pleasant stay.

Other businesses you might be interested in

View All